“Pilot Training in a TAA
Glass Cockpit Aircraft
Part 3 –
Navigation and Integrated
Flight Planning in a TAA Aircraft”
Flight Training
Magazine
By Michael G. Gaffney, MCFI, MGI
This is the third in a series of articles dealing with
learning to fly a Technically Advanced Aircraft (TAA). By
definition, TAA does not imply a glass cockpit, but a glass
cockpit does imply a TAA since almost 90% of production aircraft
rolling off the assembly lines of the 5 largest general aviation
manufacturers have glass cockpits that meet the TAA definition.
FT decided to devote a series to helping you learn most
efficiently and most effectively in the TAA trainers that you
are likely to encounter at your local airport. Ed
In
part 2, we discussed learning the Technically Advanced Aircraft
(TAA) screen navigation and keeping ahead of the aircraft in
flight. We found that there are two key challenges to safely
learning to fly TAA: Programming knowledge and cockpit fixation
and that addressing these during early training will make for a
safer flying experience. In this installment, we will explore
how to configure the cockpit for our particular flight and how
to handle changes that inevitably will come up as the flight
progresses.

The
stylish cockpit of the Avidyne Entegra equipped Cirrus
One of the primary jobs a pilot faces after
learning how to fly is configuring the aircraft to go where they
want to go. In traditional aircraft, the task was one of manual
planning with a map and a flight planning log. Once the pilot
obtained the weather and the winds, they then have the final
ingredient of the navigation quandary to determine what heading
is required to achieve a track that will produce the most
efficient flight to the destination. The pilot then used a
combination of aeronautical decision making, spatial judgment
and intuition to guide the aircraft along its path on the map.
With the advent of electronic navigation 40 years ago and the
revolution of the GPS receiver in the cockpit 12 years ago, the
entire human machine interface paradigm has changed. Just as
computers have revolutionized business and engineering
processes, advances in automation speed and dependability have
finally convinced manufacturers and the FAA to bring the
benefits of this technology to general aviation. The training
aircraft we now fly are more advanced than the corporate jets of
20 years ago. The computer, the autopilot, the GPS, and the
flight management system (FMS) all working together compliments
of the tactful guidance of the pilot, thus the definition of
TAA.

The
components of Technically Advanced Aircraft (TAA)
Pilots suddenly find themselves using
computer integration to plan and execute complex flight plans.
Sounds a lot like NASA space missions doesn’t it? Our job
becomes one of oversight of the cockpit and we have become
automation managers who are still 100% responsible for the
operation of the aircraft in the event of an emergency or
failure of a flight component. Systems of today such as the
Avidyne Entegra and the Garmin G1000 can do everything except
taxi, takeoff, and land. Pilots must still be trained to handle
everything in case automation misbehaves.
An important component of FITS Training in
TAA aircraft is teaching the pilot in training the process of
Single Pilot Resource Management (SRM). This is the methodical
process of flying with a one person crew and keeping ahead of
the aircraft so that the pilot is seldom caught off guard.
Mastering the programming aspects of the system and minimizing
fixation are key ingredients in SRM and besides maintaining
pilot proficiency, are the most effective way to enjoy flight
without peril.

The
components of Single-pilot Resources Management (SRM)
With the responsibility of the pilot now
becoming one of cockpit manager, they have also unknowingly
inherited a new flight skill: automation programmer. The pilot
must direct the system to go where they want to go and maintain
vigilance over the system to make sure that it does. We
introduced the programming task in installment 2, but now we
must talk about how the pilot programs the system to navigate to
the intended destination and how the pilot must ensure that the
autopilot is interpreting its instructions correctly.
Regardless of whether a pilot is flying a
Garmin G1000 system in a Mooney or an Avidyne Entegra in a
Cirrus, there are generally three ways to fly the aircraft on
any given flight. The pilot can enter a multiple waypoint
flight plan by pressing the “FPL” key and submit that to the
autopilot, use the “Direct-to” key to go from the current
location to a predetermined point, or they can simply ignore or
disable the automation and fly the aircraft manually.

The
Garmin G1000 FMS controls
The difference between the Garmin G1000 and
the Avidyne Entegra is where you enter the programming and how
it is “coupled” to the autopilot. This is why we recommend FITS
training to make sure that pilots are trained to handle the
respective systems in a way which will yield the best memory
retention. It does not take that much longer to learn the
systems correctly if provided with the correct kind of training
from a competent and knowledgeable instructor.

The
Avidyne Entegra GNS 430 radio stack used to input flight plans
Just what does the pilot need to know
besides how to enter the flight plan? The crux of all
navigation and the key instrument for the pilot to watch is the
horizontal situation indicator (HSI) located on the Primary
Flight Display (PFD).

The
Avidyne Entegra PFD HSI
The HSI not only contains the heading of
the aircraft but it also contains floating colored arrows,
reference bugs, and bearing pointers that the pilot or the
autopilot can interpret to make course correction inputs.
Correlate that information with the course-line superimposed on
the moving map on the Multifunction Flight Display (MFD) and the
pilot now has what we call electronic situational awareness.
This has in effect replaced some of the judgment pilots used to
need to fly cross country in the days prior to current
navigation automation. That judgment is still required of
pilots in case the automation or its supporting electronics
fails.

The
Garmin G1000 PFD HSI
The pilot needs to use the FMS buttons and
knobs in order to get the desired route waypoints into the
direct-to or multipoint flight plan. This is where the
“bump-scroll and twist” screen control navigation paradigm comes
to play.
The pilot simply enters in a string of
sequential waypoints that define the desired path from the
departure point to the destination using the FPL button. Once
the desired route is in place, then the pilot activates the leg,
places the autopilot in NAV mode, and the aircraft is ready to
follow its orders. This is called “coupling” the autopilot to
the flightplan. It is a key ingredient in TAA aircraft
operation. We will talk about the autopilot aspect of the
integration in the next article installment.

A
flightplan scenario flown on a typical training mission on a
G1000 equipped aircraft
So once the pilot masters the programming
task, they should be free to spend time doing cockpit management
and to monitor the progress of the flight and mentally stay
ahead of the aircraft as long as they can fight off the
temptation to fixate on one aspect of the scan at the expense of
another. When scan flow stalls, it usually is with the MFD
where a host of useful information lives including traffic,
weather, terrain advisory, and weather radar on more advanced
platforms. When this fixation occurs, the pilot may not catch
looming flight threats until too late. Examples include
airspace intrusions, obstacle or terrain impacts, or getting too
close to the destination before the pilot is mentally prepared
to arrive.
Conclusion
You should now have a better understanding
of the navigation and flightplan programming task required on
glass cockpit aircraft such as the Garmin G1000 and the Avidyne
Entegra. Try to get ahead of the aircraft by performing as much
of the flight-planning before the aircraft is underway. Most
trips can be completely programmed prior to engine start. Using
this approach frees the pilot up to spend more time performing
scan flow and less time watching the MFD TV. No one said that
you can’t still hand fly the aircraft to keep your hand flying
skills sharp, but at least you will know with confidence that
when you need to call on the automation to help or to completely
takeover for a while, you know exactly how.
Q

Mike Gaffney, the 2007 FAA
National Flight Instructor of the Year, is a FAAST Team Lead
Representative for the FAA Central Region, A&P mechanic ,
ATP pilot with a CFI, CFII, and CFMEI and over 3500 hours to
his credit. He is a Cessna, Diamond, and Symphony Aircraft
FITS Accepted Instructor and is accomplished in Mooney and
Beech TAA aircraft. He is the author of the ASA “G1000
Complete” FITS Accepted Tutorial software. He was
designated a Master CFI and a Master Ground Instructor by
the National Association of Flight Instructors, and was
designated the 2006 Greater St. Louis Flight Instructor of
the year and was just named the 2007 FAA Regional CFI of the
year. He is an Adjunct Professor of Aviation at Washington
University in St. Louis and is the President of Skyline
Aeronautics and Beuco Supply Company at Spirit of St. Louis
Airport; a Columbia Aircraft and Diamond Aircraft Authorized
Service Center and Parts Distribution Center and a Theilert
Aviation Diesel Service Center. He can be reached at
mggaffney@skylineaero.com