“Pilot Training in a TAA
Glass Cockpit Aircraft
Part 6 –Taking a
Checkride in a TAA Aircraft”
AOPA Flight Training
Magazine
By Michael G. Gaffney, MCFI, MGI
This is the sixth in a series of articles dealing with
learning to fly a Technically Advanced Aircraft (TAA). By
definition, TAA does not imply a glass cockpit, but a glass
cockpit does imply a TAA since almost 90% of production aircraft
rolling off the assembly lines of the 5 largest general aviation
manufacturers have glass cockpits that meet the TAA definition.
FT decided to devote a series to helping you learn most
efficiently and most effectively in the TAA trainers that you
are likely to encounter at your local airport. Ed
In part 5, we discussed learning the
Technically Advanced Aircraft (TAA) and how to plan for and
respond to emergencies. We found that the pilot will find that
the skillful response to potential failure conditions will be
predicated on their continual review of the POH and the
checklist and practicing the response to a variety of the most
common problems that could arise.
This final installment will focus on
preparing the pilot to take a FAA checkride in the TAA glass
cockpit aircraft. For the record, the list of Designated Pilot
Examiners (DPE) qualified to fly these aircraft is rather
limited, but the FAA is making a concerted effort to offer
specific model training to them in regards to how to administer
a Private Pilot and Instrument Rating Checkride. Pilot
applicants for the checkride must recognize that most of these
DPEs are qualified in a wide variety of Part 135 and Part 121
aircraft including jets, many of which have featured TAA style
glass cockpit panels for many years. They may not know the
intricate details of the Cirrus SR20, Diamond DA40, or the
Cessna 172 G1000 that you have presented for your checkride, but
they will know the common errors and how to ask the right
questions and create suitable distractions for you during your
ride, regardless of what aircraft and panel combination you
arrive in. The FAA has been helping them by creating special
seminars about these aircraft and providing them with guidelines
for the administration of these rides in what is considered a
“more complex aircraft” than pilots have ever learned to fly in.

Let us look at some areas to expect on your
Checkride so that you, the examiner, and the flight instructor
who might read this, are all on the same page. First of all,
let us establish a general baseline of things to expect from any
TAA aircraft and then we will conclude with some specific
details for the G1000 and the Avidyne Entegra systems. The
practical exam for both the Private and Instrument checkride
consists of two parts; an oral exam and a flight test portion.
The FAA has instructed designated examiners to look at the
special emphasis areas in the front of the PTS as guidance for
the things to look for on both the practical and oral portions.
The current PTS does not specifically address glass cockpit
panels and autopilots per se (although I have seen drafts of the
new PTS which do), but it does seek both a demonstration of
system knowledge and application of that knowledge in terms of
situational awareness and aeronautical decision making (ADM).
This knowledge can be demonstrated through quizzing during the
oral and during flight. The examiner will ask you questions
about the systems of the aircraft and consider any question
about the glass cockpit PFD and MFD fair game. One would
already expect the examiner to ask questions about the aircraft
itself such as V speeds, fuel quantity and type, range,
endurance, performance, oil quantity and type, and basic
questions about the engine. The question is whether they are
going to ask you a series of specific question about the glass
system that they would expect you to know in order to safely
operate the aircraft in a variety of conditions. Things like
normal and abnormal electrical system voltage, number and
location of battery(s), whether there is a vacuum system and
what it does, and basic questions about the autopilot might also
be expected. The pilot applicant should be able to describe the
process of placing the planned trip into the FPL function of the
glass cockpit system and how that plan could be modified to
divert the aircraft to an alternate destination to meet an
emergency.

Once the oral examination is complete, the
examiner will watch the applicant perform the preflight
inspection. The applicant must use the checklist and the
examiner will ask the applicant questions about the various
systems of the aircraft that they are checking, both inside and
outside the cockpit. The applicant should understand systems
like the Airframe Parachute System (CAPS) installed on a Cirrus
aircraft and they had better include that in the passenger and
crew briefing. Both the G1000 and the Avidyne system have a
fuel range management system which must be checked at the
beginning of the flight in order to make sure that the fuel
onboard the aircraft matches what the fuel range system thinks
is on the aircraft. I recommend preparing the flightplan for
the flight prior to starting the aircraft by inputting key
waypoints for the trip into the GNS430 on the Avidyne Entegra or
directly into the G1000 and then saving that into the flight
plan catalog for easy recall after engine start. This allows
the applicant to focus on key checklist items after engine start
rather than sitting in the parking spot for 5 minutes entering
information while the engine runs.
The aircraft starting sequence should
follow the checklist and should include a pre-start briefing
including a briefing on “positive exchange of flight controls”.
The applicant should check for proper oil pressure indications
immediately after engine start and then the alternators should
be brought online verifying a sufficient charging voltage.
Prior to initiating taxi, the applicant should perform a brake
check and then should ask the examiner to check their brakes
using “positive exchange of controls”. Once the taxi is begun,
the applicant should not be distracted by any inside tasks. The
FAA cautions examiners to watch for pilots who fiddle with
radios and GPS controls during taxi and to break them of this
habit. Taxi is a primary task and the applicant should focus on
staying on the centerline.

Once airborne, the applicant should
initiate the assigned trip demonstrating both pilotage, dead
reckoning, and electronic navigation. The examiner is required
to determine the applicant’s ability to operate ALL of the
equipment installed in the aircraft presented for the checkride.
It is acceptable for the applicant to use the autopilot to
maintain a specific rate of climb or airspeed and preset the
unit to level-off at the pre-selected altitude. Fully expect
the examiner to fail the autopilot to determine if the candidate
can hand fly the aircraft or to manage system failures while
maintaining situational awareness. The applicant should fly the
aircraft like they would any other aircraft; they just need to
have a good handle on the avionics and autopilot control aspects
while they perform other PTS tasks. The examiner has a plethora
of generic questions they can ask in a TAA aircraft, even if
they are not intimately familiar with that particular panel.
The applicant must be aware that many of these questions are
asked intentionally at inopportune moments of the flight to see
if the student will take the bait and become distracted. The
applicant must know that sometimes the right answer is to say
“please hold that question a moment while I finish this task…”.
The examiner will be impressed if they can keep their wits about
them and stay focused. During a stage check or graduation ride,
I will ask questions like this during a checklist process or
when inbound to an airport terminal area to see if the student
can keep on task. Flight instructors quickly recognize this
pattern and they teach to it, so the stage check feedback
process does work to modify teaching techniques and thus
positive learning is influenced.
The effective use of a TAA cockpit should
include the areas discussed throughout this “Glass Class”
series. Keep your eyes moving in a logical Scanflow; don’t
spend too much time staring at any one area. Fully expect
system failures during the flight as the examiner determines
your ability to manage the automation. Know the avionics and
the switchology down cold so that there is no doubt that you are
in charge. If you make a mistake or forget how to perform a
certain function, come up with an alternative way to accomplish
the same thing, even if it is manually by using a sectional
chart or using an airport facility directory. Many students
freeze up when they feel they have made a mistake and this leads
to a downhill slide on the rest of the checkride because now
they have fallen behind the aircraft. This can be remedied by a
good flight instructor using lots of scenarios during training,
especially under a FITS training program designed especially for
that TAA aircraft model.
For a flight test in a G1000 aircraft,
there are some key things that the examiner can look for.
First, they will simulate a PFD failure by dimming the PFD using
the brightness control on the PFD menu bezel key. The applicant
should respond by pressing the red reversionary button on the
GMA 1347 audio panel and then directing their attention to the
MFD. Engine instrumentation is now displayed over there as
well, but the moving map is lost. The applicant should press
the FPL key to bring up the flightplan in the lower right area
of the screen. If the fields displayed in that box do not show
distance and ETE, then use the menu key to reassign the fields
to those items. This process takes a minute but as long as the
applicant keeps up their scan flow outside the aircraft, then it
can be accomplished with ease. A failure of the magnetometer,
air data computer, or AHRS is also accomplished by dimming the
PFD or simply by oral quizzing while in flight. The applicants
response should be to direct their attention to the standby
instruments. The examiner should not fail systems by pulling
circuit breakers. This process is discouraged by the FAA in
advisory circulars which caution about long term degradation of
circuit breakers effectiveness when used as switches.
For a flight test in an Avidyne Entegra
equipped aircraft, there are a number of key things that the
examiner will look for. First, they will look for a solid
knowledge of the Garmin GNS 430 and how to get information from
this unit to the PFD and MFD. They will simulate failures of
both the PFD and the MFD by dimming those units with the bezel
mounted brightness controls. The applicant should respond
appropriately by referring to remaining standby instruments or
by configuring the GNS 430s to display map information on one
and navigation information about the flight plan on the other.
With a failure of the PFD or a failure of ADAHRS, the applicant
could attempt a hot restart of that unit by stating that they
would pull and reset the two circuit breakers within 10
seconds. The examiner might be satisfied with the knowledge of
what to do, or they may want the applicant to actually perform
the process to see if they can do it and keep the aircraft under
control.
Conclusion
You should now have a better understanding
of how to prepare for a Checkride in a TAA glass cockpit
aircraft. In addition to the basic tasks called out for in the
current practical test standards, the pilot must learn these
avionics systems and become completely skilled at normal and
emergency operation modes in order to meet the PTS standards for
the certificate or rating sought. The examiner will ask
questions and seek appropriate responses demonstrating knowledge
for the systems installed in the aircraft. Preparing for this
standard of examination is not difficult as long as the flight
instructor has incorporated these areas into a scenario based or
FITS instructional syllabus. Pilots should seek a flight
training company and a flight instructor who understands these
areas and is skilled in the delivery of this training philosophy
in order to avoid a costly learning curve at checkride time.
The big picture is understanding the avionics functions well
enough to ward off distraction. After all, these are the
aircraft of tomorrow and the examiner is just trying to make
sure that pilots who fly these aircraft will be able to operate
them safely.
Q

Mike Gaffney, the 2007 FAA
National Flight Instructor of the Year, is a FAAST Team Lead
Representative for the FAA Central Region, A&P mechanic ,
ATP pilot with a CFI, CFII, and CFMEI and over 3500 hours to
his credit. He is a Cessna, Diamond, and Symphony Aircraft
FITS Accepted Instructor and is accomplished in Mooney and
Beech TAA aircraft. He is the author of the ASA “G1000
Complete” FITS Accepted Tutorial software. He was
designated a Master CFI and a Master Ground Instructor by
the National Association of Flight Instructors, and was
designated the 2006 Greater St. Louis Flight Instructor of
the year and was just named the 2007 FAA Regional CFI of the
year. He is an Adjunct Professor of Aviation at Washington
University in St. Louis and is the President of Skyline
Aeronautics and Beuco Supply Company at Spirit of St. Louis
Airport; a Columbia Aircraft and Diamond Aircraft Authorized
Service Center and Parts Distribution Center and a Theilert
Aviation Diesel Service Center. He can be reached at
mggaffney@skylineaero.com